You are here

The Effects of JP-8 on High Pressure Common Rail Fuel Systems and Pumps

Award Information
Agency: Department of Defense
Branch: Army
Contract: W56HZV-10-C-0128
Agency Tracking Number: A082-128-0433
Amount: $729,993.00
Phase: Phase II
Program: SBIR
Solicitation Topic Code: A08-128
Solicitation Number: 2008.2
Timeline
Solicitation Year: 2008
Award Year: 2010
Award Start Date (Proposal Award Date): 2010-03-26
Award End Date (Contract End Date): 2012-03-26
Small Business Information
2555 Technology Blvd. P.O. Box 2603
Columbus, IN 47202
United States
DUNS: 926141110
HUBZone Owned: No
Woman Owned: Yes
Socially and Economically Disadvantaged: Yes
Principal Investigator
 David May
 Chief Technical Officer
 (812) 376-6472
 David@aei-tech.com
Business Contact
 Barry Czachura
Title: Director of Business Deve
Phone: (812) 376-6472
Email: Barry@aei-tech.com
Research Institution
N/A
Abstract

The lack of lubrication performance associated with JP-8 fuel in modern diesel engines equipped with High Pressure Common Rail (HPCR) fuel systems can lead to premature performance loss and catastrophic field failure. OEM¡¦s will need to first thoroughly understand these effects and then make provisions for JP-8 fuel compatibility as engines in the Army fleet are replaced with modern engines equipped with HPCR fuel systems. Analytical Engineering, Inc. proposes to partner with Cummins Inc. Fuel Systems in a Phase II effort to define which components in modern HPCR systems, particularly HP pumps, are susceptible to lubricity related failure when using JP-8 and high/low sulfur fuels. This effort will culminate in: 1) A comparison of fuel system wear results between a short duration (1000 hour) high stress (100% engine load) durability test and a long duration (7000 hour) actual-use (combination highway/city drive cycle) durability test to develop a superior tool for future testing. 2) Establish which system components are most susceptible to excessive wear or potential field failures, and develop corrective measures to extend the useful life of the components. 3) Incorporate the corrective measures into a new system and validate the extended durability with 4000 hours of additional testing.

* Information listed above is at the time of submission. *

US Flag An Official Website of the United States Government